Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Wikis for Collaborative Learning and Knowledge Construction

Wikis can be used when working with adult learners in a variety of ways.  Wikis have been found to be especially useful when aiming foster collaborative learning for students through active learning and social interaction; key tenants of constructivist theory (West & West, 2009).  The following example outlines an 8-week lesson plan which utilizes the use of wikis to help students actively engage with one another while working to develop their small group communication skills, research skills, and technical skills.

LESSON PLAN:

Title:
Hiring Committee Group Project
Target Audience:
Each group will consist of 3 to 4 members from Comm. 613: Recruiting and Interviewing Techniques
Learning Objectives:

Students will work in teams on an interviewing and hiring project.  This project will help you develop your small group communication skills, your ability to analyze the needs of an organization from a human resources perspective, and improve your ability to conduct research using a variety of sources.  Each team will participate in developing a wiki which outlines the procedures your hiring committee will follow in determining who the best candidate is for the job.
Materials Needed:

Computer and Internet Access

Required Course Textbook:
Arthur, D. (2006). Recruiting, Interviewing, Selecting & Orienting New Employees (4th ed.) New York,
     NY:AMACOM.
Resumes of candidates (Provided by the instructor)
Job Description (Provided by the instructor)

Access to course wiki (Provided by the instructor)
Instructions:
You have been appointed to a hiring committee.  You have been provided the resumes of the final candidates for a management position in your department.  Over the next 8 weeks you will need to complete the following:
Group Work Instructions:
Members of the group will participate in discussion about how you should go about hiring one of the candidates whose résumé is assigned to your group. You will have to do research to determine the kinds of qualifications people who work in those jobs should have. Likewise, you should research the kinds of things you'd want to know about candidates for those jobs. You will also want to know what skills and attitudes someone working in this field would have. Be sure to follow federal guidelines for your questions. And you should chronicle your research and the entire hiring process that you follow.
So, as a hiring committee, you will want to do several things:
1. Determine what the first steps you need to take in order to start the process of filling a position with your company.
2. Review the résumés and see the kinds of skills each individual has and create a detailed profile for each candidate.
3. Review the job you have to offer and discuss thoroughly what skills you should seek in hiring this position and how the skills each candidate has would be good or not so useful when it comes to hiring. (Note: you will need to expand on the skills already listed in the job description)
4. Discuss the kinds of things in general you would look for when hiring this position.
5. Discuss the things you'll need to know before coming to a final decision on who is the best hire for this position.
6. Develop a list of questions you plan to ask the candidates during an interview.
7. Present the information on your group wiki page.   For tips on how to create a wiki check out this You Tube Video:
 
Your grade is based on your participation and your contributions to the project. In other words, I want you to be part of the project and I want you to make an impact in the group. You will be evaluated on a number of criteria.  Please see the grading rubric for details.
I want each group to document their discussions, as well as the ideas, research, etc… that each member contributes.  You should make all of the determinations and obtain all of the information outlined above as well as make a decision as a group about which candidate you would like to hire. 
Each group will present their information on their group wiki page.  Your information can be presented in a number of ways; it is dependent on how you want to break it down.  I would suggest using the grading rubric provided to ensure that you are meeting all of the requirements and presenting all necessary information to the group.

Suggested Work Schedule:
Week 1:

-          Set-up a time to “meet” with your instructor and your group members.  Your instructor will send out a survey to help determine the best time for this meeting.  The meeting will take place on Skype, so make sure you have that downloaded on your computer.

-          At this meeting you will determine roles for each group member and set-up further group meeting times and deadlines (I would suggest meeting weekly to discuss the progress of your project and discuss any issues which have been presented)
Week 2:
-          Set-up your group wiki page.

-          Create content areas based on how you plan to present your information.

-          Start researching
Week 3 – 6:
-          Continue research and discussion of your group project.

-          You should be adding information to your wiki at this time.  Remember, all group members should be contributing and addressing the questions provided in the work instructions.
Week 7:
-          Begin editing your wiki.  Make sure you are reviewing content, verifying sources, and checking your citations.
Week 8:
-          Finalize your wiki. 

-          All graphics/design work should be completed.

-          All editing should be completed.

-          Project should be ready to present to the class.

Evaluation:

Grading Criteria
Missing = 0
Weak = 3
Average = 5
Good = 8
Excellent = 10
Individual Participation
Did not participate in the project
Posted minimal information in group wiki
Provided some research/information for the wiki
Provided good, well-researched input for wiki page
Provided well-researched scholarly information for wiki project.
Group Collaboration
Did not communicate with group members
Did not attend all group meetings
Attended most group meetings, provided some input for the wiki but information was questionable
Attended almost all group meetings and discussed findings with group members
Attended all group meetings.  Communicated updates and information clearly with group members.
Technical Assistance/Involvement
Did not provide any technical assistance or work on the group wiki
Checked on group wiki page but did not help with edits
Assisted with some editing and development of the wiki page
Assisted with editing and development of the wiki page, provided input on ideas
Assisted with editing and development of the wiki page, assisted with development of page layout and suggestions on graphics
Research/Information
Did not conduct any research
Conducted some research and provided some information but sources were questionable
Conducted research using credible sources, most of which was applicable to the group project
Conducted research using credible sources, the information was applicable to the group project
Conducted research using credible sources, the information was relevant to the project, also found and utilized useful theories
Learning Objectives/Goals
Did not do any work related to the learning objectives/goals of the project
Contributions were vague and did not relate to the learning objectives/goals of the project
Contributions were in line with the learning objectives and goals of the project
Showed definite understanding of the material and work showed understanding of the learning objectives/goals
Presented all work in line with the learning/objectives goals of the project.  Provided help throughout the project to team members and connected all material to overall framework of the project.
                                                                                                                                                                             TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 50
 
The assignment which has been outlined is meant to help students expand their skills in a number of ways.  West and West (2009) discussed that wiki projects can be used for a variety of purposes including knowledge construction, critical thinking, and contextual application.  This project is designed to help students pull together information and think critically about the task put in front of them.  The outcomes of this project are focused on helping students develop their small group communication skills, research skills, and technical skills through the development of a group wiki. 
The project was designed in a way which allowed the group to have a base provided by the instruction (i.e. basic information regarding the assignment, initial meeting to go over expectations and tips, etc…).  The remainder of the assignment was intentionally left open-ended in order to allow each group to address the task in their own manner.  The use of a wiki for this project gives students the opportunity to work with one another while providing feedback to each other along the way.  The overall goal of the project is to foster their ability to work in a group to reach their end goal.

References:

West, J.A, & West, M.L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration: The power of the read-
     write web. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

* This assignment has been adapted from course assignments from Keiser University – SPC 1017 and Fort Hays State University – COMM 613

 

7 comments:

  1. Your lesson plan was well focused on wiki-based group learning, which is excellent. Instructions are simple and clear. Your open-ended design approach was well justified in the last paragraph that “The remainder of the assignment was intentionally left open-ended in order to allow each group to address the task in their own manner.” Well done, Amanda.

    The piece that needs a little bit more information is your evaluation. I liked that a grading rubric was included and you referenced to it several times in your plan. It also said clearly that both the process and the final product will be evaluated. Good rubric! However, it’s not unclear to me how you will use the rubric to evaluate. Will the instructor be the only one to do the evaluation or self- and peer- evaluation will be included at the end as well? Our text says, “self-assessment and peer or team assessments can add alternate viewpoints and provide deeper insights into individual and team achievements” (West & West, 2009, p. 45). What are your thoughts on that?

    Thanks.

    Kang

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Kang,

      Thank you for your feedback. This is an assignment I have used in two different classes and have continued to edit over the last few years as I have received feedback from students. I agree that I should have been more clear regarding the evaluation and how that process would be carried out. I think, in accordance with West and West (2009), that when asking students to work on a group project there should be evaluation from both the instructor and the students.

      Something I always encourage my students to do is to provide feedback to me through their course evaluations on their projects and what changes they think could be made. In a project like this I think it would be important not only to have student provide evaluations of their work and the work of their group members, but to also provide feedback regarding how the instructions could have been developed differently. When creating a new lesson plan I generally find there is always room for improvement, but many times it is hard to know what changes need to be made until at least one group of students has already gone through the process.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Amanda,

    Great lesson plan! Is it based off of one of the courses you teach? I really like that you included samples of parts of your lesson plan such as the rubric and video. A rubric is definitely one thing that is missing from my overall lesson plan. West & West (2009) point out that rubrics are important for motivating participation, maintaining a focus, measuring progress, and striving for quality in projects and assignments.

    The video you included is really great; a wonderful resource to include on the instructor's home page as well as early on in the lesson plans. It is a good way to use video to engage students on a different level and accommodate different learning styles.

    Are you considering incorporating wikis into any of your current courses? Do your students currently participate in group work? Do you find it difficult or easier to assess their achievements in individual vs. group work?


    West, J.A, & West, M.L. (2009). Using Wikis for Online Collaboration: The Power of the Read-write Web. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Janel,

      Thanks for your comments. This is a version of an assignment that I actually have used in two different classes. The rubric provided was created specifically for this assignment though. I have never actually incorporated the use of a wiki project in this assignment before.

      Prior to this class I had never considered the use of a wiki project for any of the courses I teach. I think that creating this version of my hiring project showed me that it would be a possibility though. Currently I do have students participate in group work but it is mainly done through a threaded discussion. I actually think that is a good way for them to complete this particular project because it allows me to easily see exactly who contributed what and when they contributed it. I think before I could incorporate a wiki project into one of my courses I would definitely need to become more comfortable with using it myself though.

      Delete
  4. Amanda,

    I really like the idea of your project because it puts the research first, focusing on finding the correct qualifications of the future employee. From what I see, the strongest point of the project (in terms of a wiki) is the collaboration aspect required. If students were in a classroom, it seems like this project can be presented a number of ways. Yet, from a distance education perspective, a wiki is a good way to collaborate and then share with the other groups. If this wiki page was open to the internet, it seems like the projects by the groups would be a good resource for HR representatives looking to streamline their hiring process.

    Another part of your wiki project I like is the avoidance of micromanaging the groups. For a project like this, it is important to let the groups work at their own pace, using their own method. Your “Suggested Work Schedule” is very loose, and may benefit a class that has different methods for finishing your project. Yet, this method has its downsides such as group members not being on the same page and the propagation of nonconstructive wiki editing behaviors (West and West, 2009). Overall, good job!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Jacob,

    Thanks for your feedback. As I mentioned in my reply to Janel this is a project I have used in other courses, but I made edits to it for this assignment to make it into a wiki project. I definitely agree with the point you made regarding West and West's (2009) comments. Over the years I have tried a number of different approaches to assigning and developing group projects. As a student I understand how frustrating these projects can be at times so I am always trying to come up with a way to put them together that will work best for students. Unfortunately what I have found is that it tends to be kind of trial and error situation. What works for one group of students may not work for another group of students the following semester. Something I always try to do is encourage my students to provide feedback about their experiences in their course evaluations so that I can develop new ideas about how to manage their projects. Again, thanks for your feedback!

    ReplyDelete